Legal Opinion

Oakman v. Hurd Lumber & Woodwork Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1930No. Docket No. 69, Calendar No. 34,345PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, C. J.

The decree, appealed from, released premises from a mortgage, because the mortgage note had been surrendered to the mortgagors and a new short-time note for a like amount given and subsequent short-time notes given for balance of the debt secured by the mortgage.

Plaintiff purchased from the mortgagors and took a deed subject to the mortgage, wanted to pay, discovered the surrender of the original note and substitution and renewals, assumed that such discharged the mortgage, refused payment, and, after foreclosure by advertisement and expiration of period of redemption, filed the bill herein…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dumell v. TersteggeIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Hoy v. BiladeauOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Blume v. WestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. First State Bank v. ZossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Maxine Devlin Moore v. John C. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API