Legal Opinion
Satterfield v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided October 24, 1925No. A-5040PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.
From a conviction in the district court of McCurtain county upon a charge of larceny of domestic animals, the plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, has appealed.
The defendant relies upon two propositions: First, insufficiency of the evidence; second, error of the court in admitting incompetent evidence.
The first assignment requires no discussion. There is an abundance of evidence to sustain the verdict, and we think it not necessary to review the positive character of this testimony. If this were the only assignment of error, we should promptly affirm the case. The second…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Koontz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914
- Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917
- Vickers v. United StatesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1908
- King v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1889
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lowrey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1948
- Michelin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1939
- Janeway v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1937
- Teague v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1935
- Hughes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.