Legal Opinion
Smith v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided February 6, 1911No. A-291PublishedCited by 27 opinions
Appeal from LeFlore County Courtj Jas. L. Hale, Judge. T. N. Smith was convicted of selling intoxicating liquor, and he appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
ARMSTRONG, Judge.
The plaintiff in error, T. N. Smith, was convicted on the 4th day of May, 1909, in the county court of LeFlore county, on the charge of selling intoxicating liquor, and sentenced to 30 days in jail and a fine of $75, and has perfected his appeal to this court.
The only substantial error we find in this record is in the instructions of the court, which instructions appear to have been given orally and taken dowij by the stenographer, and not numbered in this record; the instruction in question being as follows:
“There is testimony allowed to come before you, showing the sale, or…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- King v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1889
- McClure v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
- State v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1896
3Cited by27 opinions
- Burks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1979
- Nuckols v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1984
- Doser v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1949
- People v. SilvaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Quinn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1932
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.