Legal Opinion

H. Raphael Co. v. Grote

California Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1908No. L.A. No. 2109PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Charles Monroe, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

This is an appeal upon the judgment-roll alone from a decree foreclosing certain mechanics’ liens. The contract between the owner and the contractor was admittedly valid. One half of the contract price had been paid by the owner, when, upon the contractor’s failure to proceed further with the work, the owner, under a clause in the contract reserving him the right so to do, entered and supplied the necessary material and labor to finish the building. The lien claimants are those who furnished, labor and material to the contractor before abandonment. They contend, and the court found with their…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Builders' Supply Depot v. O'ConnorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Hoffman-Marks Co. v. SpiresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Growall v. Pacific Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API