Canale v. Copello
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
Action for rent. The cause was tried before a jury, and defendant had the verdict. The appeal is from the judgment and from the order denying motion for a new trial.
Defendant, Bendetta Copello, is the surviving widow of Gios Copello, deceased; in his lifetime, and on March 1, 1894, a lease of certain premises, situated in the city of Stockton, was made to him for the term of five years, at the rental of sixty-five dollars, payable monthly, and he occupied the property, with defendant and their family, until June 17, 1894, when he died. The day before he died he executed an…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bury v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Gribble v. Columbus Brewing Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Kenney v. ParksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Stone v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by11 opinions
- J. S. Potts Drug Co. v. BenedictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Citizens Suburban Co. v. Rosemont Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Stone v. DailyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Fruitvale Canning Co. v. CottonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Barrett-Hicks Co. v. GlasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.