Legal Opinion

People v. Planer

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 21, 1937No. Crim. 1574PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The appellant was convicted of perjury under the provisions of section 118 of the Penal Code. The alleged perjury consists of falsely swearing, under oath, in a civil proceeding in the Superior Court of Merced County that neither he nor his wife signed or executed a certain quitclaim deed and bill of sale which purport to contain their signatures.

The appellant and his wife were farmers living in the vicinity of Merced. They were jointly charged, tried and convicted of the crime of perjury. Probation was granted to Mrs. Planer. A motion in arrest of judgment was denied. From the order denying…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. FitzgeraldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  2. People v. BundyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. People v. McDermottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  4. People v. PerazzoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. BaranovCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. People v. DysartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. Robinson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  4. People v. DarcyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. People v. DarcyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API