People v. Perazzo
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city . and county of San Francisco, from an order refusing a new trial, and from an order denying a motion in arrest of judgment. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
The allegations in the information upon which the defendant was convicted are that on the trial of a certain action entitled Sherwood and Meyers v. Desmond, it became and was material to its determination to know whether the defendant Perazzo had, on or about the 9th day of September, 1880, or at any other time, loaned to M. Grossini and John Tiscornia, the sum of three thousand dollars in United States gold coin, and that Perazzo on said trial testified that he did, on ór about the 9th day of September, 1880, loan to the said Grossini and Tiscornia the sum of three thousand dollars in such…
2Cited by5 opinions
- People v. CarpenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- State v. HallMontana Supreme Court · 1930
- People v. PlanerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- People v. DarcyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- People v. DarcyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943