Legal Opinion

General Motors Corp. v. Leishman

District Court, S.D. California

Decided July 29, 1949No. Civ. No. 5781-MPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCORMICK, Chief Judge.

■ This action is for a declaratory • judgment. The, relief the plaintiff seeks is. a judicial determination that certain radio tuning devices' manufactured and sold by plaintiff do not infringe Claims 7 to 11, inclusive, of United States Reissue Letters Patent No. 20,827 applied for -by- defendant May 23, 1938, and granted to him August 16, 1938, and also that such patent claims are invalid. Issue was joined by defendant’s- answer, and his counterclaim whereby he denied the allegations of plaintiff’s complaint and affirmatively alleged validity of the patent claims in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. General Electric Co. v. Jewel Incandescent Lamp Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Old Town Ribbon & Carbon Co. v. Columbia Ribbon & Carbon Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  5. Leishman v. Radio Condenser Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Leishman v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
  2. La Maur, Inc. v. DeMert & Dougherty, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API