Legal Opinion

Davis v. Newcombe Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 29, 1938No. 31,536PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gallagher, Chief Justice.

Appeal from an order denying defendant’s alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.

The following are the material facts: Plaintiffs, husband and wife, owned two lots in Chisholm, Minnesota. On May 18, 1932, they entered into a written agreement with Mesaba Gas Pool, Inc., defendant’s predecessor, to lease said property to that company for oil station purposes for a period of five years at a rental of “One Dollar ($1.00) per month, plus one cent per gallon on each gallon of gasolene purchased during the month over one hundred…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Clark v. DyeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  2. Dwyer v. Illinois Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  3. Farnum v. Peterson-Biddick Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  4. Kubu v. KabesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  5. State v. TupaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cut Price Super Markets v. Kingpin Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  2. Petition of New Ulm Telecom, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API