Legal Opinion
H.R. ex rel. Reuter v. Medtronic, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided February 13, 2014No. Case No. 1:13-cv-859PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO REMAND (Doc. 20)
TIMOTHY S. BLACK, District Judge.
This civil action is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ motion to remand (Doc. 20) and the parties’ responsive memoranda (Docs. 24, 28 1).2
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL POSTURE
Plaintiffs allege state law causes of action for: (1) negligence; (2) informed consent; (3) battery; (4) fraudulent concealment and inducement; (5) intentional infliction of emotional distress; (6) loss of consortium; (7) strict product liability; (8) strict liability (inadequate warning or instruction);…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & ManufacturingSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Schilmiller v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2014
- Carmine v. PoffenbargerDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
- Arrington v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2014
- Middendorf v. West Chester Hospital, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2017
- Dooley v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2014
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.