Legal Opinion
Dooley v. Medtronic, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Decided July 17, 2014No. Case No. 2:14-cv-02329-JTF-cgcPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REMAND
JOHN T. FOWLKES, JR., District Judge.
Before the Court comes Plaintiff Timothy Dooley’s Motion to Remand, filed on June 3, 2014. (Pl.’s Mot. Remand, ECF No. 12). On June 22, 2014, Defendants Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. filed their Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion. (Defs.’ Opp’n to Mot. Remand, ECF No. 13). Plaintiff filed his Reply Brief in Support of his Motion to Remand on July 14, 2014. (Pl.’s Reply to Mot. Remand, ECF No. 22). After reviewing the Motion and the entire record, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs Motion to Remand.
I.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Gunn v. MintonSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Middendorf v. West Chester Hospital, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2017
- McCann v. West Chester Hospital, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2017
- Clean Label Project Foundation v. Abbott LaboratoriesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022