State v. Smith
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for McLeod county, Cadwell, J., presiding, refusing a new trial after verdict of guilty in a bastardy proceeding.
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
In the complaint herein all of the facts required by statute (Gen. St. 1878, c. 17, § 1) were set forth, (State v. Snure, 29 Minn. 132, 12 N. W. Rep. 347,) and, in addition, it was alleged that the sexual intercourse with defendant, whereby the complainant became pregnant, was had on July 12, 1890. This statement was immaterial and unnecessary. On the trial the date of the first intercourse between the parties was positively fixed by the state as of the date stated in the complaint, and, under objection, the complaining witness was also allowed to testify that on two subsequent occasions, and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Thayer v. ThayerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Holcomb v. People ex rel. TuttleIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- Baker v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
- Beers v. JackmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- State v. SnureSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- New Jersey Association on Correction v. LanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- Schwab v. AriyoshiHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. BeckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- State v. HammondUtah Supreme Court · 1915
- State v. RyanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899