Legal Opinion

Pearlman v. Newburger

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 13, 1935No. Appeal 558PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Stadteeld, J.,

This is an action in assumpsit by Martin M. Pearl-man against Frank L. Newburger et al., trading as Newburger, Henderson and Loeb, instituted in the Court of Common Pleas No. 4 of Philadelphia County. Plaintiff, in the statement filed, claimed $33,323.61 with interest, to which defendants filed an affidavit of defense and counter-claim in the sum of $4,302.85, subsequently reduced by stipulation to $2,181.10, with interest. Plaintiff filed a reply to the counter-claim. Subsequently defendants filed two supplemental affidavits of defense.

The case was called for trial…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Roig v. TimSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
  2. Gunnis, Barritt & Co. v. CluffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  3. Russ v. SadlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  4. Stern v. GorsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Condran v. KennedySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Socialist Labor CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Croyle v. DellapeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Shenker v. Harr, TreasurerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Griffith WillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Swick v. Tarentum Borough School DistrictSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API