Stojanovski v. Strobl and Manoogian, PC
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SANCTIONS
GADOLA, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Blagoja and Olga Stojanovski filed their complaint October 9, 1991. Plaintiffs amended their complaint October 11, 1991. Defendant Strobl and Manoogi- an, P.C. filed a motion for summary judgment December 2, 1991. Plaintiffs filed “objections” to defendant’s motion along with a motion for Fed.R.Civ.P. 11 sanctions December 19, 1991. Separately, plaintiffs filed a counter motion for summary judgment…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ovall Dale Kendall v. The Hoover CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- James v. WadasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Michael G. Schroyer Gail R. Schroyer v. Kenneth P. Frankel Gerald M. Smith Company, L.P.A., D/B/A Smith & SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Sarah Goldstein v. Hutton, Ingram, Yuzek, Gainen, Carroll & BertolottiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Garrett v. DerbesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Cavallaro v. Law Office of Shapiro & KreismanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.