Legal Opinion
United States v. Jay Michael Puig, Michael Hance, Claimant-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided August 9, 2005No. 04-2687Published
1Opinion of the Court
419 F.3d 700
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Jay Michael PUIG, Defendant.
Michael Hance, Claimant-Appellant.
No. 04-2687.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: December 15, 2004.
Filed: August 9, 2005.
Patrick Dinneen, argued, Silver Bay, Minnesota, for appellant.
James S. Alexander, argued, Minneapolis, Minnesota, for appellee Asst. U.S. Attorney.
Before BYE, HANSEN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
HANSEN, Circuit Judge.
1
Following the district court's1 entry of a Final Order of Forfeiture in the criminal prosecution of Jay Michael Puig, which included the forfeiture…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Dusenbery v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Daniel Watkins Cynthia Watkins v. Terry Lundell Stephanie LundellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Dan Ivy v. Warren Kimbrough David W. ShullCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Jay Michael Puig, Michael Hance, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.