Legal Opinion

United States v. Jay Michael Puig, Michael Hance, Claimant-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 9, 2005No. 04-2687PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANSEN, Circuit Judge.

Following the district court’s1 entry of a Final Order of Forfeiture in the criminal prosecution of Jay Michael Puig, which included the forfeiture of a motorcycle and motorcycle parts now claimed to be owned by the appellant in this case, Michael Hance, Mr. Hance filed a third-party petition seeking adjudication of his asserted claim to the forfeited property. The district court dismissed the third-party petition as untimely. Rather than appeal that order, Hance filed a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion seeking to reopen the Final Order of Forfeiture. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dusenbery v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Dan Ivy v. Warren Kimbrough David W. ShullCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  3. United States v. Menelao Orlando Estevez, Appeal of Jose Guillermo HaroCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  4. United States v. BoulerDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1996

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Piedade Pedro De Almeida, Harber Corporation, Gatex Corporation, Mabon Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  2. Dsi Associates LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  3. In Re Petters Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
  4. United States v. A. Erpenbeck, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  5. Sunrise Academy v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API