Legal Opinion

Young v. Berger

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1892No. 15,850PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the Delaware Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcBride, C. J.

— The appellee contracted with one Searles to make some repairs to certain buildings belonging to him. The repairs included the placing of some mantels and grates.

Searles purchased the mantels and grates of the appellant, who by this suit sought to foreclose a material man’s lien for their value.

The court, by request of parties, made a special finding of the facts and stated his conclusions of law thereon. The facts as found by the court were favorable to the appellant, and were full and explicit,except as to the giving of the notice required by section 5 of the act of March 6,1883. Elliott’s…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Parkison v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Schwartz v. HolycrossIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925
  3. Waterbury v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Angola State Bank v. State Ex Rel. SandersIndiana Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Universal Insurance Co. v. GloverIndiana Court of Appeals · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API