Legal Opinion

United States v. Dwight Mfg. Co.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided November 19, 1913No. 254PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action by the United States against the Dwight Manufacturing Company to recover penalties under Immigration Act Feb. 20, 1907, c. 1134, §§ 4, 5, 34 Stat. 900 (U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1911, p. 503). On demurrer to- declaration.

1Opinion of the Court

DODGE, Circuit Judge.

For the reasons and upon the terms stated in the opinion herein dated March 31, 1913, 210 Fed. 85, the government was allowed to amend for the second time, after a demurrer to its declaration as first amended had meen heard but not decided. To its present amended declaration the defendant again demurred on April 10, 1913, ánd upon this demurrer there has now been a hearing.

This declaration as filed contains 122 counts, alike in form, and differing only in the names of persons, countries, or places. The questions raised by the demurrer are the same under each count.

As…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Baltic Mills Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903
  2. United States v. Dwight Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1913
  3. United States v. Baltic Mills Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1902

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Dwight Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1913
  2. United States v. International Silver Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API