United States v. Baltic Mills Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
In Error to the Circujt Court of the United States for the District of Connecticut.
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Circuit Judge.
This is a writ of error by the plaintiff m the court below to review a judgment for the defendant upon a demurrer to the complaint.
The action was brought to recover penalties incurred, as is alleged, under section 3 of the act of Congress of March 3, 1891, entitled “An act in amendment of the various acts relative to immigration and the importation of aliens under contract or agreement to perform labor.” 26 Stat. 1084, c. 551 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1295]. Section 3 is an amendment of the first section of the act known as the “Alien Contract Labor Law,” passed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. WiltbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
- Wayman v. SouthardSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
- United States v. HartwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- Minis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
- United States v. CraigU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1886
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Miller-Dunn Company, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
- Harvey v. BodmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Clarke v. Atlantic Stevedoring Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1908
- United States v. Dwight Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1913
- United States v. River Spinning Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1918