Rheox, Inc. v. Entact, Inc., Defendant/third Party v. Rmt, Inc. And American Minerals, Inc., Third-Party
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.
Appellant, Rheox, Inc. (“Rheox”), the plaintiff in this patent infringement case, appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment for the appellees, En-tact, Inc. (“Entact”). We affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment of non-infringement because we conclude that Rheox is precluded from asserting that the claim term “calcium orthophosphate” covers monocalcium orthophosphate and triple superphosphate.
BACKGROUND
Rheox is the assignee of U.S. Patent No. 5,162,600 (“the '600 patent”). The '600 patent is directed to an inexpensive method of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Seachange International, Inc. v. C-Cor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Computer Docking Station Corp. v. Dell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Andersen Corp. v. Fiber Composites, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Springs Window Fashions Lp, Shade-O-Matic Ltd., and Manor Tec, Inc. v. Novo Industries, L.P., Defendant-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Avid Technology, Inc. v. Harmonic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.