Legal Opinion

Dockerty v. Hutson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1890No. 14,285PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From the Henry Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBerkshire, C. J.

— The appellant brought this action to recover damages because of an injury which he alleges he received from the bite of a ferocious and vicious dog owned and harbored by the appellee.

After testing the sufficiency of the complaint by demurrer, the appellee filed as his only answer a general denial.

The cause was submitted to a jury, who returned a verdict for the appellee. The appellant moved for a venire de novo, and this motion being overruled, he filed his motion for a new trial, which was likewise overruled.

To the action of the court in overruling said motions the appellant reserved…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Graham v. PayneIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis Railway Co. v. AsburyIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wright v. Peabody Coal Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1948
  2. State Ex Rel. Board of Medical Registration & Examination v. HayesIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Lutz v. GOLDBLATT BROTHERS, INC., ETC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Steele v. Anderson CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1956
  5. Gordon v. KaufmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API