Legal Opinion

Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis Railway Co. v. Asbury

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1889No. 12,511PublishedCited by 19 opinions

From the Madison Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBerkshire, J.

This was an action instituted by the appellee to recover damages on account of personal injuries which she claims to have sustained because of the fault of the appellant.

The appellant filed but one paragraph of answer, which was a general denial.

There was a jury trial, a verdict returned for the appellee, and, over a motion for a new trial, a judgment rendered for the appellee.

The appellant appeals to this court, and assigns two errors, as follows :

1st. The court erred in overruling the demurrer to the complaint.

2d. The court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

The complaint…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. HedgesIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. OstranderIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. GrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. GrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Reeves v. PloughIndiana Supreme Court · 1872

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Aurelius v. Lake Erie & Western RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Wysong v. NealisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railroad v. CoxIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Indiana Stone Co. v. StewartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. WilfongIndiana Supreme Court · 1910

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API