Legal Opinion
Edwards Bros. v. Overdrive Logistics, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided March 13, 2003No. A02A1876PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mikell, Judge.
Edwards Bros., Inc. (“Edwards Bros.”) appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to Overdrive Logistics, Inc. (“Overdrive”) on its breach of contract claim. We affirm.
Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. A de novo standard of review applies to an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.
So viewed, the evidence shows that Overdrive, a federally…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Saunders, Stuckey & Mullis, Inc. v. Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1995
- Seaboard Air Line R. v. Henry Chanin Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. CouncilSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Exel, Inc. v. Southern Refrigerated Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc. v. Megatrux Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- Mark VII Transportation Co. v. Responsive Trucking, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2009
- Intransit, Inc. v. Excel North American Road Transport, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2006
- TOYO TIRE NORTH AMERICA MANUFACTURING, INC. v. DAVIS Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.