Butterworth v. . Gould
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court, in the first district, affirming the decision of Judge Ingraham, on a trial without a jury, in favor of the defendant. The action was for money had and received by the defendant from the government on a mail contract to the plaintiff’s use.
Read the full summary
Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court, in the first district, affirming the decision of Judge Ingraham, on a trial without a jury, in favor of the defendant. The action was for money had and received by the defendant from the government on a mail contract to the plaintiff’s use. The facts found by the court are the following: 1st. That Peter B. Starke contracted with the government of the Unitéd States, on the 23d day of October, 1837, to transport the mail from Jackson to Columbus, in the State of Mississippi, being mail route 3,801, from January 1, 1838, to June…
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] It appears in this case that certain moneys became due under a…
2Cited by23 opinions
- City of Norfolk v. Norfolk CountySupreme Court of Virginia · 1917
- Heywood v. Northern Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Peckham v. . Van WagenenNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Shultz v. BoydIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
- Town of Rushville v. President & Trustees of RushvilleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1891
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.