Samuel Bice Johnson v. Steve Puckett, Commissioner James v. Anderson, Superintendent, Mississippi State Penitentiary State of Mississippi
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KING, Chief Judge:
Samuel Johnson appeals the district court’s denial of his habeas corpus application. Johnson challenges his continued confinemeiit on several grounds, but his chief complaint is that the state failed to disclose exculpatory material and suborned perjury in violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), and Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150, 92 S.Ct. 763, 31 L.Ed.2d 104 (1972). Because we conclude the district court correctly denied relief on this and all of Johnson’s other assignments of error, we affirm.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Smith v. CockrellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Lookingbill v. CockrellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Jones v. CainCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- Magee v. Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2003
- Carlos Poree v. Kandy CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.