Legal Opinion

McSweeney v. Reid

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1962PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtEdward G. Baker, J.

Petitioner, under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, seeks an order in the nature of a writ of mandamus “ directing and commanding respondent to grant him a hearing on his claim.”

*647Petitioner alleges he sustained personal injuries on December 12,1961 by reason of the negligent operation of one of respondents’ trucks; that he was hospitalized from February 26, 1962 to March 9,1962 and had an open draining wound until March 30, 1962; that by notice dated March 14, 1962 respondent authority set April 4,1962 for an oral examination on the matter, and that at such time petitioner was unable to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of Coombs v. EdwardsNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  2. Toscano v. McGoldrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Matter of Pruzan v. ValentineNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  4. Tolchinsky v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  5. Daniel J. Rice, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matos v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API