Legal Opinion
Bowen v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 29, 2001No. 99-352CPublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION1
BASKIR, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff alleges that his termination from an Active Guard and Reserve position in the Alaska Air National Guard was unlawful. He seeks military pay, allowances and other benefits commensurate with the service and grade of the position. The Court finds it lacks jurisdiction to entertain the complaint because the claim is barred by the statute of limitations. Accordingly, Defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted. We do not, therefore, reach the merits of cross-motions for summary judgment.
BACKGROUND
Mr. Bowen, formerly a Major, filed this suit on June 1, 1999.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Perpich v. Department of DefenseSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Ronald J. Cornetta v. The United States of America and John Lehman, Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Cottrell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Gary W. Bowen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Ware v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Holland v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Frymire v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- McNabb v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.