Legal Opinion
Friends of Animals v. Jewell
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 4, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2014-0357PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERYL A. HOWELL, United States District Judge
Friends of Animals, an animal advocacy organization, brings suit against the National Fish and Wildlife Services (“FWS”) and United States Department of Interior (collectively “the Federal Defendants”), for a judgment declaring Title I, Section 127 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014 (“Section 127”) unconstitutional or, alternatively, declaring that the Reinstatement of the Regulation That Excludes U.S. Captive-Bred Scimitar-Horned Oryx, Ad-dax, and Dama Gazelle From Certain Prohibitions (“Reinstatement Rule”), 79 Fed.…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Tolan v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Friends of Animals v. Sally JewellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Friends of Animals v. AsheDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Atchafalaya Basinkeeper v. BernhardtDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2021
- Friends of Animals v. Sally JewellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Friends of Animals v. Sally JewellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016