Legal Opinion

Friends of Animals v. Sally Jewell

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 3, 2016No. 15-5070PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Concurring opinion filed by Senior Circuit Judge SENTELLE.

EDWARDS, Senior Circuit Judge:

Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (“Act” or “ESA”), 16 U.S.C. § 1531 et seq., makes it unlawful “for any person subject to the jurisdiction of the United States to,” inter alia, “take” any endangered species within the United States or “possess, sell, deliver, carry, transport, or ship, by any means whatsoever” any endangered species “taken” in violation of the Act. 16 U.S.C. § 1538(a)(1)(B), (D). Under the Act, “take” means “harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Davis v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Friends of Animals v. Sally JewellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
  2. New England Anti-Vivisection Society v. United States Fish & Wildlife ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  3. Campaign Legal Center v. FECCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2022
  4. Environmental Defense Fund v. Envtl. Prot. AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
  5. Campaign Legal Center v. FECCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API