Friends of Animals v. Sally Jewell

SENTÉLLE, Senior Circuit Judge,

concurring:

I write separately not because I have any deep disagreement with the majority — indeed, I wholly embrace the majority’s conclusion and nearly all of its lan*1046guage — but only to express a single misgiving. As the majority makes plain, “the requirement that a claimant have ‘standing is an essential and unchanging part of the case-or-controversy requirement of Article III.’ ” Maj. Op. at 1040 (quoting Davis v. FEC, 554 U.S. 724, 733, 128 S.Ct. 2759, 171 L.Ed.2d 737 (2008) (other citations and internal quotation marks omitted)). I am not convinced that…