Darr v. Mutual Life Ins.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
HINCKS, District Judge.
Before the entry of judgment upon my findings and conclusions dated April 30, 1947, wherein I indicated that the plaintiffs under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq., were entitled to recover the sum of $660 in the aggregate by way of premium for overtime work performed in 1940 and $660 additional by way of liquidated damages, the Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947, 29 U.S.C.A. § 251 et seq., was enacted. Thereupon the defendant moved to reopen the case to permit it to plead, and prove if it can, the new defenses provided in Sections 9 and 11 of…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- West Coast Hotel Co. v. ParrishSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Seese v. Bethlehem Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
- Seese v. Bethlehem Steel Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1947
- Thomas v. Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
- Kemp v. Day & Zimmerman, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1948
- Jackson v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.