Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 2013No. COA12-809PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STROUD, Judge.

Robert Stephen Smith (“defendant”) appeals from his convictions for resisting, delaying, or obstructing a public officer and indecent exposure. For the following reasons, we find no error in his trial.

I. Background

On 13 August 2010, defendant was charged by magistrate’s order with resisting, delaying or obstructing a public officer and indecent *473exposure. Defendant pleaded no contest in district court, then appealed for trial de novo in Gaston County Superior Court.

The State’s evidence at trial tended to show that on 13 August 2010, defendant was sitting in his car in the parking…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. State v. FennerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. State v. AycothSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. State v. BunchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
  5. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. Skinner and N.ingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  2. State v. SuttonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  3. WALL v. GULLEDGEDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API