Legal Opinion

Harman v. Taurus International Manufacturing, Inc. (CONSOLIDATED FOR DISCOVERY PROCEEDINGS)

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided March 15, 2023No. 3:21-cv-00098Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION CHRISTOPHER DAVID HARMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CIVIL ACT. NO. 3:21-cv-98-ECM ) (WO) TAURUS INTERNATIONAL ) MANUFACTURING, INC., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Christopher David Harman alleges he was injured by a defect in the Taurus PT 738 TCP Pistol (hereinafter, “PT 738 pistol”). He brings this action against defendants Taurus International Manufacturing, Inc. (“TIMI”)—the manufacturer of the PT 738 pistol—and Taurus Holdings, Inc. (“Taurus…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Brooks v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. Charles M. McInteerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  5. Carl Legg v. WyethCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API