Legal Opinion
Naivette, Inc. v. Bishinger
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 12, 1932No. 5945, 5946PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONS, Circuit Judge.
The four patents in suit, all held valid and infringed by the District Court, relate to the so-called “permanent” hair waving art. The appeals, while involving separate plaintiffs and defendants, are from decisions below in cases arising out of the same alleged act of infringement, tried as one, and argued and briefed together on review. The Herold Brothers Company is a dealer, and acquired the devices which it sold from Naivette, Inc. The patents in suit are Mayer reissue patent No. 17,393, originally granted March 29, 1927 (reissue application March 11, 192-9), for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Corning v. BurdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Reo Motor Car Co. v. Gear Grinding MacH. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
- Lyman Mfg. Co. v. Bassick Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1927
- Keller v. Adams-Campbell Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- National Hairdressers' & Cosmetologists' Ass'n v. Philad Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1941
- Johnson Co. v. Philad Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Perfect Circle Co. v. Hastings Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
- H. W. Roos Co. v. McMillanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
- Whitman v. Andrus. Andrus v. Whitman Besser Mfg. Co. v. WhitmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.