O'Connor v. Frasher
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment for the defendant, and from an order denying a new trial, in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Sepulveda, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Sharpstein, J.:
The plaintiff sues in ejectment for the recovery of the possession of the land described in the complaint. The conclusion at which we have arrived renders it unnecessary to consider anything beyond the uncontroverted facts found by the Court below. The land which the plaintiff seeks to recover was sold and patented on the 21st day of April, 1974, by the State of California, to one Robert Thompson, from whom the plaintiff deraigns his title through the mesne conveyance of one W, S. Rosecrans, whose conveyance to plaintiff is dated April 12th, 1875. The land was listed to the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Frisbie v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Doll v. MeadorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Thomas v. LawlorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
- O'Connor v. FrasherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
3Cited by9 opinions
- Vallejo & Northern R.R. v. Reed Orchard Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Kentfield v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- McCreery v. FullerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Galvin v. PalmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Dreyfus v. BadgerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.