Dreyfus v. Badger
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County and from an order denying a new trial. W. B. Cope, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
This was an action of ejectment in which judgment went for plaintiff. Defendant appeals from, the judgment and from an order denying a new trial.
The land in contest was listed to the state in lieu of certain school land; and a patent thereto was issued by the state to plaintiff’s testator in pursuance of a certificate of purchase issued to one C. F. Wilson. Wilson filed his application for the land in the state land-office on December 31, 1886; his application was approved August 30, 1889; a certificate of purchase was issued to him September 11, 1889; he assigned his certificate to Isadore…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Smelting Co. v. KempSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Steel v. Smelting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Wright v. RoseberrySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Barden v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- French v. FyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bernhard v. WallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Standard Quicksilver Co. v. HabishawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Youle v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Saunders v. La Purisima Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
- Caldwell v. PiersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.