Legal Opinion

Wadler v. Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 20, 2016No. Case No. 15-cv-02356-JCSPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*833ORDER DENYING MOTION TO EXCLUDE

JOSEPH C. SPERO, Chief Magistrate Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

On the eve of trial, Defendants1 have brought a Motion to Exclude Protected Information from the Trial of this Action (“Motion” or “Motion to Exclude”) asking the Court to exclude virtually all of the evidence and testimony Plaintiff might rely upon to prove his case, including “all testimony that may be based on information [Plaintiff] learned in the course of his service as Bio-Rad’s general counsel.” A hearing on the Motion was held on December 15, 2016. For the reasons stated below, the Motion is DENIED.2

I…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Crosby v. National Foreign Trade CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Capital Gains Research Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Erhart v. BofI Holding, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2017
  2. Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Amazon.com, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2021
  3. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. NDI Office Furniture, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2021
  4. Giuseppe Pampena v. Elon R.MuskDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025
  5. SEA SALT LLC v. BELLEROSEDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API