Legal Opinion
Giuseppe Pampena v. Elon R.Musk
District Court, N.D. California
Decided August 5, 2025No. 3:22-cv-05937Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 GIUSEPPE PAMPENA, et al., Case No. 22-cv-05937-CRB (DMR) 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER ON INTERROGATORIES AND 9 v. RELATED SEALING MOTIONS 10 ELON MUSK, Re: Dkt. Nos. 168, 173, 174, 175, 221 11 Defendant. 12 In this securities class action, Plaintiffs move to compel responses to six interrogatories 13 (Plf. ROGs). [Docket No. 168 (Plf. JDL).] Defendant Elon Musk moves to compel Plaintiffs to 14 amend their responses to seventeen interrogatories (Def. ROGs). [Docket Nos. 174 (Def. First 15 JDL), 175 (Def. Second JDL).] 16 On June…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Zucco Partners, LLC v. Digimarc Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Angela K. Hagestad v. Roger C. Tragesser v. Oregon State Bar, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Jules Brody Joyce T. Crawford v. Transitional Hospitals Corporation Wendy L. Simpson Richard L. ConteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.