Legal Opinion

Kiachif v. Philco International Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 6, 1950PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGOHEY, District Judge.

This is a motion by defendant for an order directing the issuance of letters roga-tory to the Appropriate Judicial Authority in Teheran, Iran, for the examination of a witness on written interrogatories and cross-interrogatories. Defendant’s attorney avers that the Kingdom of Iran will not permit examination by commission, and this is not contraverted by the plaintiffs.

Plaintiffs’ attorney objects to interrogatories and suggests the issuance of an open commission providing that defendant pay plaintiffs’ expenses and a reasonable counsel fee. It is claimed that the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. De Villeneuve v. Morning Journal Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1913

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Branyan v. Koninklijke Luchtvaart MaatschappijDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953
  2. Sandoval v. United Nuclear Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Kiachif v. Philco International Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1950
  4. Moezie v. MoezieDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API