Legal Opinion

Kiachif v. Philco International Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 6, 1950PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McGOHEY, District Judge.

Defendant moves under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 37(d), 28 U.S.C.A., to dismiss the complaint for failure of plaintiff Gholam H. Kiachif to appear for deposition pursuant to notices served on his attorney January 21, 1949 and February 28, 1950.

It appears that Gholam H. Kiachif, who is a resident of Iran, was in this country in 1948 but, as the result of a heart attack, *279was in a hospital continuously from the day of his arrival until his departure, which was prior to the service of the notice of January 21, 1949; and that he was in Iran at the time of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kiachif v. Philco International Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1950

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kalosha v. NovickNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API