Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Sturges

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1839PublishedCited by 4 opinions

ERROR to the Cass Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.

Debt by the assignee of a promissory note against the maker. Pleas, nil debet, failure of consideration, *257&c. Issues on the pleas, and verdict for the defendant. Motion for a new trial overruled, and judgment on the verdict.

H. Cooper, for the plaintiff. A. S. White and R. A. Lochwoocl, for the defendant.

It does not appear from the record, which contains all the evidence, that the plaintiff produced at the trial any assignment'of the note to him. It must therefore be considered, that, under the plea of nil debet, the plaintiff did not show any right to recover. The' circumstance, that no…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wheeler v. RobbIndiana Supreme Court · 1824

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smelser v. Wayne & Union Straight Line Turnpike Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Bean v. KeenIndiana Supreme Court · 1844
  3. Lake Shore & M. S. Ry. Co. v. WarrenWyoming Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Fudge v. MarquellIndiana Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API