Legal Opinion

Killoy v. Reliance National Indemnity

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1996No. 95-551PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hunt

Appellant, Edward Killoy, Jr. (claimant), appeals the Workers’ Compensation Court’s order concluding that he was not permanently totally disabled and, therefore was not entitled to permanent total disability benefits as a result of his work-related injury.

We reverse and remand.

Appellant raises the following issues for review, which we restate as follows:

1. Did the Workers’ Compensation Court err in finding that claimant had a reasonable prospect of being able to tolerate his pain and physically perform at regular employment?

*902. Did the Workers’ Compensation Court err in failing to award…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Buckman v. Montana Deaconess HospitalMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Dumont v. Wickens Bros. Construction Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Caekaert v. State Compensation Mutual InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Wunderlich v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Jensen v. Zook Bros. Construction Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davis v. Credit GeneralMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Marriage of LauferMontana Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API