Legal Opinion

Cummins v. State

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 20, 1915No. 4242PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from 1County Court, Grant County; J. W. Bird, Judge. Proceedings by the State, on the complaint of Nelia Thompson, against Lester Cummins. Judgment against defendant, and he brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

C0LLIEE, C.

This is a proceeding instituted by Nelia Thompson under section 618, Comp. Laws 1909 (section 4401, Eev. Laws 1910), which said complaint, omitting the caption and signature, is in words and figures following:

“Nelia Thompson, being duly sworn, upon oath, says: That she is pregnant with a child, which, if born alive, will be a bastard, and that Lester Cummins is the father thereof.”

Upon this complaint a warrant was duly issued. Said plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was arrested and'taken before the county court, and thereupon demanded a trial by jury.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. McKiddy v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  3. Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Pinkstaff v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. State v. McCainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API