Dixon v. State
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.
This is a bastardy proceeding instituted under section 1816, Revised Laws 1910. The plaintiff, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was tried before a jury in the county court and found guilty and was ordered to pay to the prose-cutrix! the sum of $650 and costs, $200 to be paid immediately, and the balance in installments of $15 per month. From this judgment the defendant has appealed.
It is contended that the county court was without jurisdiction to hear and determine the case; that -section 3816, Revised Laws 1910, conferring jurisdiction on the county court to try and determine bastardy…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gird v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Holcomb v. People ex rel. TuttleIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- State v. HammondUtah Supreme Court · 1915
- Powelson v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Silverwood v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Thomas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- State v. PattonMontana Supreme Court · 1936
- Gregory v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Thomas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941