Asmussen v. CSX Transportation
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
Asmussen v. CSX Transportation, Inc., No. 814, September Term 2019 Opinion by Kehoe, J. PRETRIAL PROCEDURE – SCHEDULING ORDERS – AMENDMENT OR MODIFICATION Scheduling-order deadlines are not unyieldingly rigid, and, under Md. Rule 2-504(c), the circuit court “shall” modify scheduling orders “to prevent injustice.” But the deadlines are not to be complaisantly lax either. Only when substantial compliance with the scheduling order and good cause for deviation have been shown by the party unable to meet the order’s deadlines does modification “prevent injustice.” Md. Rule 2-504(c). PRETRIAL…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Frederick Road Ltd. Partnership v. SturmCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Scarlett Harbor Associates Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Prince Johnson v. Thomas PerezCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ferguson v. Creative Hairdressers, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2023
- Romeka v. RadAmerica IICourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Sylvia Washington v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2026
- The Estate of Billie Staton, et al. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2026
- Watson v. TimberlakeCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021