Legal Opinion

Kieschnick v. Martin

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 30, 1919No. 6004PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Milam County; John Watson, Judge. Suit by Richard Kieschniek and wife against Horace -Martin and others. From a •decree for defendants dissolving a temporary injunction, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

* Writ of error granted by Supreme Court March 26, 1919. This suit was instituted in the district court of Milam county, by appellants against the appellees, to restrain the enforcement of a judgment and execution issued out of the justice court of Crockett county, Tex., and levied upon certain cotton alleged to belong to appellants. A temporary injunction returnable to the October term of the district court of Milam county was granted upon the original petition filed September 25, 1916, against the appellees, the Thorndale Mercantile Company, and Horace Martin, constable of precinct No. 8,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Landa v. ObertTexas Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Trawick v. Martin Brown Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. WareTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Wallace & Co. v. FinbergTexas Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Moore v. JordanTexas Supreme Court · 1886

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Martin v. KieschnickTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  2. Trustees of Crosby Independent School Dist. v. West Disinfecting Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. of Baltimore v. LowryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. Gold v. InsallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. Pinkston v. Farmers State Bank of CenterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API