Legal Opinion

Moore v. Jordan

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1886No. Case No. 2160PublishedCited by 41 opinions

Appeal from Houston. Tried below before the Hon. A. M. Miller, special judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Stayton, Associate Justice.

The appellant obtained a judgment against David Jordan and Tamer Jordan, in justice’s court, and against their sureties on a replevin bond given to release property seized under a writ of sequestration. From that judgment David Jordan alone appealed. The appeal was dismissed in the district court, to which the cause had been transferred on account of the disqualification of the county judge, on the ground that the appeal bond was insufficient. From that judgment David Jordan and the sureties on the replevin bond perfected an appeal to this court, which was decided…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bank of North America v. WheelerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1859
  2. Collins v. PrenticeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1843
  3. Duffield v. BodineTexas Supreme Court · 1847

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Southern Canal Co. v. State Board of Water EngineersTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. RodgersTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Harter v. CurryTexas Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Cotton v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. KnouffCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API