Paul Masson Co. v. Colonial Insurance
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
IRWIN, J. *
This appeal arises from an action in declaratory relief to determine the respective rights and obligations of insurance carriers in respect to an “unloading” case in which Lane Grinstead, the plaintiff therein, claimed personal injury.
The insurers involved are appellant Colonial Insurance Company (Colonial); respondents, The Travelers Indemnity Company (Travelers); Imperial Casualty and Indemnity Company (Imperial); and The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company (Aetna).
The trial court entered judgment declaring that the appellant Colonial is the primary insurer and that all…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
- Jensen v. Traders & General Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Colonial InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- General Insurance v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Farmers Ins. Exch. v. GeyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. JacoberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Argonaut Insurance v. Transport Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1972
- Employers Casualty Insurance v. FoustCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Schwalbe v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Oliver MacHinery Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.