Legal Opinion

Gonzales & Gonzales Bonds & Insurance Agency Inc. v. United States Department of Homeland Security

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 21, 2012No. C 11-02267 DMRPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DONNA M. RYU, United States Magistrate Judge.

Defendant United States Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) moves pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 for summary judgment against all claims in Plaintiff Gonzales and Gonzales Bonds and Insurance Agency, Inc.’s complaint. Plaintiff opposes Defendant’s motion and cross-moves for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, the court grants in part and denies in part…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chaparro Navarro v. Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API