Legal Opinion

County of Alameda v. State Board of Equalization

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 30, 1982No. Civ. 20642PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CARR, J.

The County of Alameda (County) filed an action for declaratory relief under Revenue and Taxation Code section 538 1 to test the validity of the representative period designated by defendant State Board of Equalization (Board) for assessing nonscheduled aircraft 2 for the 1980-1981 assessment year. County appeals from the judgment granting Board’s motion for summary judgment and denying its cross motion for summary judgment.

The questions presented on this appeal are:

I. Does the Board have the statutory authority to modify the designated representative period by excluding…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Estes v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Morris v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Wildlife Alive v. ChickeringCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Braniff Airways, Inc. v. Nebraska State Board of Equalization & AssessmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. In Re RojasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. American Airlines, Inc. v. County of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Union of American Physicians & Dentists v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. Auerbach v. Los Angeles County Assessment Appeals Board No. 2California Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Jetsuite, Inc. v. Cnty. of L. A., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  5. American Airlines, Inc. v. County of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API